allthingseurope:

Szigetköz, Hungary (by alma csutka)

babyanimalgifs:

this is a sea turtle. I know they can live for over 500 years but I never knew they got this big

purmu:

Doodled a fairy creature heavily inspired by woolly aphids a.k.a. actual garden fairies

arianagrandgay:

no offense but squidward saying “nobody cares about the fate of labor as long as they can get their instant gratification” is more woke than anything wendy’s twitter or any liberal has ever said

vintage-sweden:

Sixten Karlsson, 1920, Sweden.

chaosophia218:

Circle Map showing the Anatomy of the Fibonacci Number and the Symmetrical Binary Code of Nature.

Numbers are not found in nature. Humans have created numbers in order to abstractly represent what we find. In nature, all things are individuals and together equal one whole individual the Universe. Similarly in math, 1 is the only number and all other numbers are multiples of this 1. So our number system is perfectly designed to represent the seemingly endless individuals that we find in nature. Things built of things, built of things.

The Universe is the only thing that is truly one of a kind. It is the only true individual. Like us it is composed of a number of smaller pieces but on an infinitely larger scale. The largest individuals we know that the Universe is composed of are super clusters, which are composed of galaxies, which in turn are composed of solar systems, planets, molecules, atoms and so on all the way down to its most basic pieces. It would seem logical that the shape, motion and interaction of the base units “the smallest particles of the Universe" would be directly responsible for the shape, motion and interaction of all larger cooperative structures which are composed of those smallest units. Perhaps the smallest individuals of our Universe are responsible for creating the Golden Ratio that we find so prevalent in all that we see.

The Code
When you add up any length of the Fibonacci sequence the sum is always 1 less than another Fibonacci number. Example:
1+1+2=4 (1 less than 5)
1+1+2+3=7 (1 less than 8)
This is true no matter how far you count up the Fibonacci sequence. The sum of all the numbers together will always be 1 less than another Fibonacci number. So why not add a 1? Perhaps Fibonacci was off by 1. This again seems logical because 1+1=2+1=3. That’s three 1’s in beginning. When we add a third 1 to the beginning of the Fibonacci sequence an amazing thing happens. With the extra 1 the whole sequence becomes another Fibonacci number. Example:
1+1+1+2+3=8 (another Fibonacci number)
Even more amazing is what happens when you continue this chain or mirror it back down to the last 1.
1+1+1+2+3+2+1+1+1=13 (another Fibonacci number)
In this way you can see the symmetrical anatomy of the Fibonacci number 13. This works for every Fibonacci number. Like the Universe, every Fibonacci number is composed of smaller pieces. Take the number 21 for example. If you were to break 21 into its two smaller Fibonacci numbers you would get 13 and 8. Then break those down into there smaller Fibonacci numbers. Eventually you will end up with a bunch of 1’s. When looking at a bunch of 1’s there is no discernable code or pattern, but if you group some of those 1’s into 2’s you can start to see the code of nature. 

This diagram is a hypothesis on the shape, motion and interaction of the base units of the Universe. This theory offers convincing evidence that the smallest particles or “building blocks” of the Universe are circular in shape and all the same size. There is a circular gear type process which results in symmetrical cooperative structures that create Fibonacci numbers, and subsequently exhibit the Golden Ratio. In this theory 1+1 only equals 2 when motion is not part of the equation. Motion is what enables interaction to occur between individuals. Without motion everything would remain as it originally was, stagnant and without growth or evolution.

iskinaary:

ask-link-the-hylian-champion:

iskinaary:

watching spiderverse makes me never wanna see another live action movie ever again like. why did we ever start making comic books into live action movies?? make it animated to explore the art form instead of trying to make it hyper realistic you fucking cowards

Okay but have you just concidered

Robert Downey Jr.

i have and i don’t care about him